<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lost At E Minor: For creative people &#187; Rich Lam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostateminor.com/tag/rich-lam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostateminor.com</link>
	<description>Lost At E Minor: For creative people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alfred Eisenstaedt vs Rich Lam: a new legendary kiss</title>
		<link>http://www.lostateminor.com/2012/03/20/alfred-eisenstaedt-vs-rich-lam-a-new-legendary-kiss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostateminor.com/2012/03/20/alfred-eisenstaedt-vs-rich-lam-a-new-legendary-kiss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 05:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eisenstaedt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iconic Kiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Lam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostateminor.com/?p=92246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was looking at the top images of 2011, for some reason. I couldn&#8217;t help notice the similarities between Eisenstaedt&#8217;s iconic 1945 VJ Day Times Square Kiss and Rich Lam&#8217;s iconic shot from last year (2011) taken in Vancouver (Getty). A similar sort of subject composition can be seen. Notice how the male takes the dominant upper left with the female taking lower [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.lostateminor.com/2012/03/20/alfred-eisenstaedt-vs-rich-lam-a-new-legendary-kiss/">Alfred Eisenstaedt vs Rich Lam: a new legendary kiss</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.lostateminor.com">Lost At E Minor: For creative people</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[			<p><a href="http://www.lostateminor.com/2012/03/20/alfred-eisenstaedt-vs-rich-lam-a-new-legendary-kiss/"><img src="http://cdn0.lostateminor.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/LegendaryKiss.jpg" width="480" height="340"  alt="Alfred Eisenstaedt vs Rich Lam: a new legendary kiss" /></a></p>
		<p>I was looking at the top images of 2011, for some reason. I couldn&#8217;t help notice the similarities between <a href="http://www.artscenecal.com/ArticlesFile/Archive/Articles1997/Articles0397/AEisenstaedt.html" target="_blank">Eisenstaedt&#8217;s</a> iconic 1945 VJ Day Times Square Kiss and Rich Lam&#8217;s iconic shot from last year (2011) taken in Vancouver (Getty). A similar sort of subject composition can be seen. <span id="more-92246"></span></p>
<p>Notice how the male takes the dominant upper left with the female taking lower right position (the same can be seen in classic Hollywood love film posters). And we can see some background detail, but not too much. The image tone and sense of &#8217;the moment&#8217; is similar. However, the emotional intensity is far different due to the tone of the scene in 2011 and also the ominous riot cop, out of focus, in the foreground of Lam&#8217;s 2011 shot. The difference between eras is also interesting from a social perspective.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.lostateminor.com/2012/03/20/alfred-eisenstaedt-vs-rich-lam-a-new-legendary-kiss/">Alfred Eisenstaedt vs Rich Lam: a new legendary kiss</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.lostateminor.com">Lost At E Minor: For creative people</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostateminor.com/2012/03/20/alfred-eisenstaedt-vs-rich-lam-a-new-legendary-kiss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>