Comments on: Jill Greenberg

By: Francisco

Francisco — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:01:09 +0000

She had the guts to do this. I admire her for that! The photos are amazing also…

By: Shane

Shane — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:24:02 +0000

Michael Moore was said to be inappropriate by showing a biased version of events around the bush government, this was said to stretch the truth and not be fair but do politicians play fair, do they take cheap shots? I say fight fire with fire, I applaud Jill for having the courage to take him on like this, perhaps if more people did this kind of thing Bush would never have gotten elected and the world wouldnt be in the state its in now.

By: frank

frank — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:44:49 +0000

In one sense its great that she is taking a political stance as an artist but it just seems more like a free publicity stunt for her own exposure gains,, also, as i am a photographer i know she may lose more than she may gain by doing what she did, and if she was so passionate about her distaste for him she would not have agreed to shoot him in the first place.

By: bradley

bradley — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:34:48 +0000

i’m not a fan of mccain or pretty much any republican for that matter.. but this is totally inappropriate. she was given the opportunity to photograph him, and he probably trust and confided in the fact that she would be objective.. this is a total disregard to any mutual respect she had for her subject.. no kudos! there’s way of showing you’re distaste for a subject than to literally paint him as a vampire